Kenya General Election · 10 Aug 2027
Ochieng OmbakaDagoretti North · 2027

Dagoretti North

The constituency, in numbers

What the constituency actually has — roads, schools, clinics, colleges, markets, police stations — and where the money goes. Figures are cited to their source; blanks mean we haven't verified them yet.

CDF spending

How the CDF money is actually spent

Built from four years of Auditor-General reports and the NG-CDF Board's own project proposal. Every figure traces to a page in a public document — sources at the bottom of this page.

Financial yearPersonnelCommittee/adminDevelopmentTotal payments
2020/213,154,80010,680,729115,313,716129,149,245
2021/224,380,71011,336,721153,881,123169,598,554
2022/233,528,23013,222,06691,731,118108,481,414
2023/24Not audited locally — excluded from totals
2024/25 (accrual basis)5,610,6707,520,496224,782,149237,913,315
4-year total16,674,41042,760,012585,708,106645,142,528

Personnel = Compensation of Employees. Committee/admin = Committee Expenses + Use of Goods & Services + Other Payments + Depreciation. Development = Transfers to Other Government Units + Other Grants and Transfers + Acquisition of Assets, applied consistently across all four years.

The "Monitoring and Evaluation" line is a second helping of administration, not evaluation. FY2022/23: "1.0 Administration" already carries Committee Allowances (Ksh 1,258,000) and Use of Goods & Services (Ksh 5,176,324). "2.0 Monitoring and evaluation" then carries another Committee Allowances line (Ksh 928,000), another Use of Goods & Services line (Ksh 1,007,942), and "Capacity building" (Ksh 2,421,050). No line item funds an actual, independent evaluation of whether projects worked. Source: Budget Execution by Sectors and Projects, FY2022/23 audit report
Chairs for the chief's office, at Ksh 9,000 each. The FY2021/22 approved project proposal's line 36 bundles office expansion (Ksh 1,646,000), "purchase of office furniture — 6 chairs @ 9,000 and 1 table @ 35,000" (Ksh 89,000), a sewer connection (Ksh 250,000) and a gate repair (Ksh 15,000) into one Ksh 2,000,000 line for Kileleshwa chiefs office. Furniture and running costs for a chief's office are the Ministry of Interior's own recurrent-budget responsibility. Nothing in the proposal shows this originating from a resident-facing consultation. Source: NG-CDF Board, Approved Project Proposal, Code 275, Dagoretti North, FY2021/22, item 36 of 36
The deeper argument is duplication, not overhead. NG-CDF has faced repeated constitutional challenge — at the High Court and in Supreme Court advisory proceedings — precisely because it funds primary schools, secondary schools, police stations and chiefs' camps that already sit under a line ministry's or a devolved county government's own budget. The 90.8% of spend that is "development" here is still overwhelmingly re-funding institutions with their own budget lines — not building anything new. That is the case for spending differently, not just less on overhead.

Proposed, budgeted, and spent are three different numbers

FY2021/22 is the one year where the constituency's own proposal, its parliamentary-approved budget, and its audited actual spend can all be lined up.

137.1MApproved proposal = Original Budget
230.8MFinal Budget, +68% on the proposal
169.6MActually spent — 73% of Final Budget

The Original Budget (Ksh 137,088,879) matches the FY2021/22 project proposal to the shilling. Parliament's Final Budget then grew by Ksh 93.7M purely from money the constituency was already holding: Ksh 42.0M in opening cash-book balance and Appropriations-in-Aid, plus Ksh 51.7M in disbursements approved in earlier years but not yet paid. Of the Ksh 230.8M available, only Ksh 169.6M was spent; Ksh 61.2M rolled forward again.

What this means for the plan below: the constraint has not been the size of the annual allocation — it has been getting already-available money out the door into projects residents asked for. A shortlist of pre-costed, baraza-validated projects is itself an accountability improvement.
A 5-year plan

CDF in the next 5 years

2027/28–2031/32 — six programme areas, sized to reach all five wards — Kileleshwa, Kilimani, Kawangware, Gatina, Kabiro — rather than one at a time, funding asset classes CDF hasn't funded here before.

“CDF will no longer be the MP's pocket money.”

Download the one-page CDF pitch (PDF)
Mobility & livelihoods

Boda boda, taxi & car-wash centers

Sheltered stages with sanitation, water and a kiosk for boda boda and Uber/taxi operators — 2 per ward, 10 total; separate car-wash sites with proper drainage — 3 per ward, 15 total. 25 sites overall.

180Mcapital, 5 yrs
Community & creative space

Community halls, one per ward

Multi-purpose halls with a stage, seating for 250–300, and a fitted creative-arts space, plus a small grant programme for resident theatre, music and dance groups.

121Mcapital + programme
Sports at ward level

Pools, grounds & cross-ward leagues

One new training pool in each of the four wards without one; Kilimani ward already has pools at Kilimani and Lavington primary schools, so it gets the funded access programme instead; upgraded football pitches, tennis and volleyball courts; an annual cross-ward league in swimming, cycling, tennis, football and volleyball, sponsored jointly with corporate and sports-federation partners the way community leagues usually are, not carried by CDF alone.

271Mcapital + programme
Knowledge

Community libraries, one per ward

Reading room, digital-access computers, solar backup, a stocked collection, a funded librarian, and an annual book-replenishment budget.

108Mcapital + programme
Recreation & food security

Recreational parks & a 500,000-tree food forest

Five new or reconstituted public spaces, one per ward, doubling as planting sites; five ward propagation nurseries; 500,000 fruit trees — guava, avocado, loquat and other indigenous species — with two years of paid aftercare built in.

260Mcapital + programme
Programme integrity

Participation, oversight & upkeep

Baraza validation of every project before funds are committed, one proportionate monitoring & evaluation line, site works/way-leaves, and a maintenance sinking fund.

116Mprogramme, 5 yrs

Card figures are direct project costs. Design/supervision fees and contingency (Ksh 78.1M, applied across capital works) are not folded into these five — they're counted separately in the Ksh 874.1M core-plan total below.

How this is run differs from current practice

  • Baraza before budget. Every ward's project list is validated at a published, minuted community baraza — attendance registers included — before it is submitted, not assembled afterward.
  • Personnel stays lean by design. Delivery leans on seconded national and county government staff and structured community volunteers — ward project committees, library stewards, "tree champions" — instead of new hires. Compensation of Employees does not grow with the programme.
  • Not the MP's pocket money. The baraza-validated project list, the budget, and spend-to-date are published before implementation each year. No discretionary reallocation outside that published list.

What it costs, and an honest gap

The core plan (mobility, halls, pools, libraries, programme integrity, plus fees and contingency) comes to Ksh 874.1M against a Ksh 192M/year × 5 target (Ksh 960M). Five recreational spaces and the 500,000-tree programme, costed properly, add a further Ksh 260M — a combined Ksh 1,134.1M, or roughly Ksh 226.8M/year against a 4-year audited average NG-CDF transfer of Ksh 155M/year.

Closing the Ksh 174.1M gap, honestly: phase the tree programme and recreational spaces into years 3–7 rather than 1–5; seek co-funding — county environment funds, Kenya Forest Service/KEFRI partnerships, or corporate/NGO climate financing are routinely available for tree programmes; and bring in sponsors for the cross-ward tournaments — telcos, breweries and sports federations already fund community leagues like this, so CDF doesn't need to carry the full cost. None of this requires inflating unit costs to make the arithmetic look tidier than it is.

All unit costs are planning-level estimates pending a professional bill of quantities.

The facts

What Dagoretti North has

Classified roads

KeNHA (national trunk roads)
not yet recorded
KURA (urban roads)
not yet recorded
KeRRA (rural roads)
not yet recorded

Kilometres of gazetted road by the agency responsible.

Schools

Primary — public
not yet recorded
Primary — private / APBET
not yet recorded
Secondary — public
not yet recorded
Secondary — private
not yet recorded

Source: Ministry of Education / Nairobi County education office.

Colleges & universities

Universities
not yet recorded
TVET institutions
not yet recorded
Other colleges
not yet recorded

Source: Commission for University Education; TVET Authority.

Health facilities

Public
not yet recorded
Private / faith-based
not yet recorded

Source: Kenya Master Health Facility List (KMHFL).

Other public infrastructure

Markets
not yet recorded
Police stations / posts
not yet recorded

NG-CDF allocations

YearAllocation
2020/21KSh 154,767,724Audit report
2021/22KSh 188,777,758Audit report
2022/23KSh 97,000,000Audit report
2024/25KSh 179,483,419Audit report

Dagoretti North NG-CDF office · NG-CDF Board

Issues raised

What residents are reporting

No issues have been reported yet. Residents can raise one from any ward site.

Reports come in through the five ward sites. See the wards →